<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Great Cover Debates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://magculture.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://magculture.com/blog/?p=2054</link>
	<description>Magazine design, magazine news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:44:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://magculture.com/blog/?p=2054&#038;cpage=1#comment-67710</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magculture.com/blog/?p=2054#comment-67710</guid>
		<description>Yes you&#039;re right, at least they&#039;ve included those titles, just a bit of a disappointing final list of examples for each</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes you&#8217;re right, at least they&#8217;ve included those titles, just a bit of a disappointing final list of examples for each</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://magculture.com/blog/?p=2054&#038;cpage=1#comment-67505</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magculture.com/blog/?p=2054#comment-67505</guid>
		<description>Guess it’s just better than I expected, which is very different to it being a great list. At least Oz, Nova and Time Out are represented by good examples.

Agree about The Face, though – like I said in my post, there a load of covers – The Face, Private Eye, Vogue as you say Mark – that are the wrong covers but the right magazines. That first Face cover disappeared without trace – not til Brody got involved did the covers start being special.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess it’s just better than I expected, which is very different to it being a great list. At least Oz, Nova and Time Out are represented by good examples.</p>
<p>Agree about The Face, though – like I said in my post, there a load of covers – The Face, Private Eye, Vogue as you say Mark – that are the wrong covers but the right magazines. That first Face cover disappeared without trace – not til Brody got involved did the covers start being special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://magculture.com/blog/?p=2054&#038;cpage=1#comment-67502</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magculture.com/blog/?p=2054#comment-67502</guid>
		<description>I think by and large it&#039;s a shocking shortlist. Hardly any of those are the best covers of the mags in question. What about the Gold issue of Vogue (Kate Moss as the Queen&#039;s head?) Or the green jelly one? 
As for the Face - there are plenty of better examples: China, Hard Times, Grace Jones, Paris... And no Town?? 
Hardly any of those shortlisted are &#039;iconic&#039; or even particularly memorable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think by and large it&#8217;s a shocking shortlist. Hardly any of those are the best covers of the mags in question. What about the Gold issue of Vogue (Kate Moss as the Queen&#8217;s head?) Or the green jelly one?<br />
As for the Face &#8211; there are plenty of better examples: China, Hard Times, Grace Jones, Paris&#8230; And no Town??<br />
Hardly any of those shortlisted are &#8216;iconic&#8217; or even particularly memorable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
