<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meet The Gentlewoman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://magculture.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://magculture.com/blog/?p=4434</link>
	<description>Magazine design, magazine news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:39:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://magculture.com/blog/?p=4434&#038;cpage=1#comment-84135</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magculture.com/blog/?p=4434#comment-84135</guid>
		<description>There are shortcomings in your summary about fashion but that not the point here. I don&#039;t know what you meant about a conservative women&#039;s market, they could have easily forayed into something much bigger but being Dutch...

To me people have become illusional. The design is just a facade for fashion styling that bares no relation the the actual reality man. It&#039;s even worse when there is a power monopoly because of the magazine&#039;s connections to whatever top editor. Honestly, I don&#039;t need to see models wearing coned tip bras. It&#039;s been done. And can&#039;t they find women who are unknown than picking women from their contact list? There is something perverse about the whole magazine to be really honest. Gentlewoman seems pretty gimmicky and Fantastic Man bordering on incredible self-vanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are shortcomings in your summary about fashion but that not the point here. I don&#8217;t know what you meant about a conservative women&#8217;s market, they could have easily forayed into something much bigger but being Dutch&#8230;</p>
<p>To me people have become illusional. The design is just a facade for fashion styling that bares no relation the the actual reality man. It&#8217;s even worse when there is a power monopoly because of the magazine&#8217;s connections to whatever top editor. Honestly, I don&#8217;t need to see models wearing coned tip bras. It&#8217;s been done. And can&#8217;t they find women who are unknown than picking women from their contact list? There is something perverse about the whole magazine to be really honest. Gentlewoman seems pretty gimmicky and Fantastic Man bordering on incredible self-vanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://magculture.com/blog/?p=4434&#038;cpage=1#comment-80640</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magculture.com/blog/?p=4434#comment-80640</guid>
		<description>i find it kind of crazy how many ads they have in the front of this issue. also, it seems more photo-heavy than in the past, with less of an emphasis on writing, which is a shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i find it kind of crazy how many ads they have in the front of this issue. also, it seems more photo-heavy than in the past, with less of an emphasis on writing, which is a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Harpin</title>
		<link>http://magculture.com/blog/?p=4434&#038;cpage=1#comment-80603</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Harpin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magculture.com/blog/?p=4434#comment-80603</guid>
		<description>Perhaps if the Fantastic Man and the gentlewoman got together they could make a wonder child.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps if the Fantastic Man and the gentlewoman got together they could make a wonder child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
