Comments on: Strong cover strategy

By: Ed

Ed — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:18:37 +0000

Same coverlines… The Sunday Times Magazine ran a cover last weekend identical to the Telegraph’s Sunday supplement from a year back! Exactly the same apart from the coverlines,,,

read-this.typepad.com

By: Joe steel

Joe steel — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:33:08 +0000

This isn’t the one that’s in the shops, is it the US edition? If so you’d think the Guardian would check their facts more carefully… oh wait.

By: Crispian

Crispian — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:25:35 +0000

Good grief! Do you think they simply ‘forgot’ to change the cover lines on an old layout, or have they finally succumbed to re-running old features to save money?

Let’s face it, I doubt many of the readers would notice.

By: andy smith

andy smith — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:10:54 +0000

This was picked up by The Guardian this morning, page 3 of G2… glad to see they read magculture

By: Mark

Mark — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:52:58 +0000

(I meant repeat not steal, obv!)

By: simon

simon — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 00:09:46 +0000

Wow that is so lame! How embarrasing……….!!

By: Mark

Mark — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:59:28 +0000

Is it for real? Why would you steal the 1,293 things headline? Is it the ultimate coverline number?!

By: uberVU - social comments

uberVU - social comments — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:27:54 +0000

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by cristianlupsa: Culmea autoplagiatului: http://magculture.com/blog/?p=5182 :-)…

By: MA

MA — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:02:37 +0000

these health magazines are always the same every issue anyway – they must have run out of adjectives for their coverlines and thought what the hell – Ctrl C Ctrl V

By: Rad4Ever

Rad4Ever — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:49:27 +0000

Someones had too many protein shakes!