{"product_id":"the-humanist-review-of-ai-1","title":"The Humanist Review of AI #1","description":"\u003ch6\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e195 x 260 mm, 224 pages\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/h6\u003e\n\u003ch6\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRedmond, Washington, US\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/h6\u003e\n\u003ch6\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eEditor and Curator:\u003cspan\u003e \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/strong\u003eAnabelle Nicoud\u003c\/h6\u003e\n\u003ch6\u003e\n\u003cstrong\u003eDesign: \u003c\/strong\u003eMade Thought\u003c\/h6\u003e\n\u003cp dir=\"ltr\"\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFunded by Microsoft AI, \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eThe Humanist Review of AI\u003c\/em\u003e\u003cspan\u003e is a new title confronting a world in which we coexist with artificial intelligence, aiming to shed light on debates surrounding an industry that often feels out of our control. In a note to readers, publisher of the \u003cem\u003eReview\u003c\/em\u003e and CEO of Microsoft AI, Mustafa Suleyman, positions \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003ethe publication \u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003eas an space in which conversations can converge and become liberated from inter-industry echo chambers. A sceptic might assume the entire project is a one-sided puff for the technology, but with copy editing from the \u003cem\u003eDelayed Gratification\u003c\/em\u003e team, the \u003cem\u003eReview\u003c\/em\u003e delivers a more nuanced and eclectic perspective on this evolving technology.\u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp dir=\"ltr\"\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThis first edition—themed ‘People and Technology’—brings together a range of contributors, from philosophers and artists to investors and technologists, and asks: ‘\u003c\/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIn a world we now share with intelligent machines, what does it mean to create, to work, to love, to struggle, to matter?’ \u003c\/span\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp dir=\"ltr\"\u003e\u003cmeta charset=\"UTF-8\"\u003eDivided into three movements—systems, stakes, and soul—readers can expect a variety of essays and perspectives. Including, an analysis from psychologist Alison Gopnik drawing on folkloric fables to illustrate how children can explore and develop in ways currently inimitable to AI; philosopher Elizabeth Anderson muses on the work free world hypothesised by AI optimists and argues that in reality our subsequent loss of purpose might not be so compelling; Alain de Botton positions AI as an unlikely saviour in matters of the heart, rather than a force driving social isolation; and musician Nick Cave shares a selection of correspondence from his online advice forum ‘The Red Hand Files’ featuring a note on AI songwriting generators.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https:\/\/humanistreview.ai\/\"\u003ehumanistreview.ai\u003c\/a\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"magCulture","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":45516849905773,"sku":null,"price":23.0,"currency_code":"GBP","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0514\/7889\/files\/TheHumanistReviewofAI.png?v=1785255629","url":"https:\/\/magculture.com\/products\/the-humanist-review-of-ai-1","provider":"magCulture","version":"1.0","type":"link"}